Eatertainment and Cravability (possibly the end of being healthy)

Eatertainment (noun): the art of cramming as much hedonistic pleasure–flavor, oil, saltiness and overall satisfaction–into a food without regard for the absurd amount of calories, fat or even carcinogens contained in the “food”.

You’ve seen the new Doritos commercial with the attractive girl eating a bag of “Late Night: Tacos at Midnight” which show her cruising through some unnamed metropolis in a taxi, eating these magical, triangular bits of manufactured corn crisps with neon cheese powder.

devil chips
devil chips

It’s fancy marketing.  But it’s a problem.  I’ve struggled with my own weight since I was a kid.  I’m not obese by any means, but apparently the proverbial chips (no pun intended) are stacked against me.  I run a lot (more than any of my friends) but I still have a dozen or so pounds that just won’t come off.  So I’m stuck in stalemate between where I want to be and where nature does.

According to a recent article in the New Yorker (and decades of research on the topic of American obesity) I’m not alone.  Somewhere over 1/3 of Americans are now considered overweight.  An many are extremely overweight to the point of physical endangerment.  I do my best to eat healthy (no Doritos for me, mayo is a no-no, and I haven’t had a candy bar or non-diet soda in about 10 years).  But the struggle is hard.

Some research suspects that our natural inclination is to pack away the pounds because our instincts are worried about being broadsided by a period of famine or scarce resources (like a 10-day meditation retreat or Ramadan…).  Makes sense since it must have been really friggen hard to take down a woolly mammoth back in 10,000 BC (don’t go see the movie).  I’ll believe that research, considering it’s damn hard to drop the pounds or forgo that next piece of Costc0 Pizza (come on, it’s seriously only $1.50!).

Anywho, in the New Yorker they go back and forth on what really the cause is.  They also give some cool new terms to the US overeating issue like “craveability” and “eatertainment” and “conditioned hypereating”.

“conditioned hypereating”…describe[s] how people respond to these laboratory-designed concoctions. Foods like Cinnabons and Starbucks’ Strawberries & Crème Frappuccinos are…like drugs: “Conditioned hypereating works the same way as other ‘stimulus response’ disorders in which reward is involved, such as compulsive gambling and substance abuse.” – Elizabeth Kolbert, XXXL in the New Yorker (pg 2 online)

The sum is that it’s a huge problem.  Like cripple our national health care plan huge.  My take away is that there’s a strange convergence of factors that are making this issue balloon like a stomach after a chinese buffet.  Human instinct, fancy marketing, low cost of processed foods (especially those that are corn-based) are making a crazy, delicious, edible layer cake of medical emergency.

Which brings me back to what was supposed to be the point of this post:

Dear Doritos,

We’re on to you.  Stop making those ridiculously named snacks that entice our taste buds and enlarge our backsides.

Munch love,

Joe

Nixing the daily commute

I work from home, so commuting is not that difficult for me.  I usually only make one stop (the bathroom) on my long commute from bed to desk.  It’s a tough life sure.  But I’ve been working on ways to shorten the commute (it’s all about desk location).  On another note, not having any commute has caused a few strange byproducts to emerge:

  1. I hate driving (in traffic or not) now.  It’s not that I find it difficult (though it arguably is the most dangerous thing I do these days), it’s just that I could be working, reading, sleeping or doing ANYTHING else besides putting all of my energy, effort and attention into driving a car and dodging dumb drivers (and not-so-dumb pedestrians and cyclists).
  2. It’s also decreased the time I spend outside or talking to people quite drastically.  But that’s an entirely different topic.

The real issue, I think, is a total loss of efficiency when driving becomes the ‘job’.  Removing focus from the task is dangerous (even listening to music can be hazardous…I recommend pulling over to change CDs or get an ipod/changer).  According to a 07 Gallup poll, Americans spend about 46 minutes in a car every day as a product of their commute.  Worse is 85% do the commute alone.

My point is this: The need for great public transportation is more than ever (but it’s absence is a long trend), but the real need is for automation.  The more control we secede to technology in getting us to where we’re going (face it cars already park themselves) the better off America will be, in my humble opinion.  The effects will be this:

  • falling traffic injuries and fatalities
  • drastically lower drunk driving offenses
  • less congestion
  • shorter commute times
  • increased commuter productivity (remember, that’s 46 minutes that you could either spend working or sleeping)
  • fewer traffic collisions
  • and probably a few benefits that I haven’t thought of.

Some people are already thinking about this, but they always do with a caveat (that the public isn’t ready).  I call bulls**t.  I already hate driving.  Really the only excuse is technology (but there are bright spots there).  The military always has the best stuff and in the case of vehicles that drive themselves it’s leagues ahead of any civilian application (just read about the DARPA challenge or the newest “tools” that have come from it).  Like the internet this technology will trickle down (but not soon enough for me) and revolutionize the way we get around.  

To the left is a picture of a advanced concept of the Autonomous Mobile (Autonomobile) which was designed by the same dudes that did the G1.  I don’t necessarily think this will garner the attention of the car enthusiast in America, but it does show how different a car that drives itself will make our lives (VERY VERY different).

Kinda like a small RV crossed with a unshapely Geo Metro, meets the bay windows of a beautiful Vermont home.

Looking at it only makes me think of one other thing: If cars are this cool and functional, why the hell do we need houses?!

The new News.

In a recent news article from Austin360.com‘s Omar Gallaga he reported on the news about the news that surrounded the death of the King of Pop (..tear..), and I think, got something right on.

The basic analysis is that TMZ, a celebrity gossip site and atrocious television show (honestly I want to hurt myself when Molly puts it on, it’s possible worse than the Hills) beat out CNN as the faster, more reliable news source.  I’ll give them that (for celebrity gossip only) considering they have 100s of free lancers stalking the protagonists of their “news worthy” news stories (before they even make the story).

It’s an interesting point, but this quote is really sums up what has happened:

It was a make-or-break moment for TMZ: …a clearer signal that the torch for breaking-news coverage had been passed from cable news to scrappy online news sites. The 24-hour news cycle may now be closer to 24 minutes.

So thanks Twitter, for giving ADHD to our ADD.