<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JosephThibault.com &#187; browser wars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.josephthibault.com/tag/browser-wars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.josephthibault.com</link>
	<description>Ready, set, Joe.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 23:36:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Browser In/Efficiency</title>
		<link>http://www.josephthibault.com/2009/browser-inefficiency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.josephthibault.com/2009/browser-inefficiency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Thibault</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quickbooks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.josephthibault.com/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love Google Chrome.  It&#8217;s probably the biggest boost to my at home/at work productivity since I added more RAM to my laptop (before I did, my IBM could only handle 1 window of Firefox open at a time: this isn&#8217;t a good thing for someone who is currently blogging with no less than 10 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.google.com/chrome"><img class="alignright" title="Chrome" src="http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/images/logo_sm.jpg" alt="" width="192" height="40" /></a>I love Google Chrome.  It&#8217;s probably the biggest boost to my at home/at work productivity since I added more RAM to my laptop (before I did, my IBM could only handle 1 window of Firefox open at a time: this isn&#8217;t a good thing for someone who is currently blogging with no less than 10 tabs, two separate windows for gmail and gdocs and a music player open).</p>
<p>Now you might be wondering how it increased my efficiency.  There are a couple of ways, mostly more noticeable to me when I&#8217;m not using my regular computer and <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome">Chrome</a>.  They are: 1 click access to the most important sites to me (<a href="http://www.google.com/support/chrome/bin/answer.py?answer=95739&amp;hl=en">which I have listed across the bookmark bar, just as icons&#8230;when you create a bookmark in Chrome, just delete the title if the site has a nice favicon and voila: instant mini shortcuts.  I bet you could fit 50 or more along the bookmark toolbar</a>) and 2 click access to my most frequently visited sites (whenever you open Chrome or a new tab all of your most recently and frequently visited sites are listed).  It&#8217;s telling that my top three sites are all <a href="http://globalclassroom.us">work related</a>, followed by <a href="http://blogger.com">blogger</a> (1/2 work, 1/2 play), <a href="http://flickr.com">Flickr</a>, whatever <a href="http://www.cbssports.com/fantasy">Fantasy sports league</a> I&#8217;m in at the time, <a href="http://www.apple.com/trailers">Apple Movie trailers</a> (I love movie trailers) and a couple other that change like the seasonal aisle at your local pharmacy or grocery store.</p>
<p>Chrome is also great cause I can have 10+ tabs open in multiple windows and they all show as much of the webpage as possible.  I am really sold on Google&#8217;s design and am a huge Chrome-fanboy.</p>
<p>That being said, never before have I ever not used a website because of browser incompatibility&#8211;until now.  I often switch back and forth between FF and IE to test sites and visuals when designing a new site, blogging or building courses, but if I think something is going to be a highly frequented site then I want it compatible with Chrome (because that is more and more my desktop).  To manage my side-business finances I really want to use <a href="http://quickbooks.intuit.com/">Quickbooks Simple Start</a> as opposed to just a spreadsheet.  But they don&#8217;t support Chrome.  They also don&#8217;t support FF on linux/Ubuntu.  That has been a big enough obstacle to prevent me from using their product so far, even though it&#8217;s free and I could easily open FF instead.  I might make the leap but only after a lot of searching for an alternative.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that I&#8217;m super picky, it&#8217;s that I hate inefficiency (even if it decreases over time) no matter how minuscule.  I think it&#8217;s telling too that as a consumer of online information and applications that I would be so turned off from adopting a product that doesn&#8217;t work at all/as well when paired with another technology (this is a derivation of incompatibility of OS and programs as well, however the barriers are smaller when we&#8217;re talking about browsers&#8211;but no less significant to the end user).</p>
<p>So, I guess the conclusion is that even if your product is the bee&#8217;s knees, it better work on whatever I&#8217;m using.  And if it doesn&#8217;t (cough, Quickbooks, cough) then you might not get me as a customer as easily.  And as a provider of such products in work and personal, the sites better work the first time someone comes to them or there&#8217;s probably a good chance that you&#8217;ll lose that person forever.</p>
<p>Now, if only I can find a better online program than Google Docs to manage our small business finances that would be sweet (suggestions welcome).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.josephthibault.com/2009/browser-inefficiency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

